More than 500 farmers and ranchers from the Klamath
Basin met at the Klamath County Fairgrounds to hear the Bureau of
Reclamation's (BOR's) plan to have them forgo 50,000 acre feet (AF)
irrigation water this year so more water could go downstream to the
endangered fish.
Dave Sabo, BOR area manager, explained the plan,
which is outlined in the KWUA Press Release 03/03/03.
Explained is the 'Groundwater Substitution' plan, which details getting
paid to use your own well water rather than stored Project water,
and also the 'Crop Idling' plan, where BOR pays you to not farm your
ground.
According to Sabo, the Department of the Interior (DOI),
in meeting demands of the biological opinion (BO) developed
by the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) for threatened coho
salmon, calls for a water bank this year totaling 50,000 AF, with
"deposits" to the "bank" coming from temporary crop idling and use of
groundwater in place of Project surface water. The Project water "banked"
in Upper Klamath Lake will help Reclamation meet lake level objectives for
endangered suckers, as well as downstream flow objectives established by
NMFS for coho salmon. Next year the BO calls for 75,000AF, and thereafter
100,000AF. So, 50,000AF of water will be sent down the river for
environmental purposes this summer, and if the irrigators do not produce
it, their water will be shut off if the lake/river levels fall under the
BO's demand. Again, it is 'voluntary.'
Sabo pointed out that this water only will meet 'ESA
requirements' and 'river flows', and does not include other water demands
like tribal trust. {Last year 63,000AF 'tribal trust' water was sent
down Klamath River, and an Tulelake Irrigation District was told midsummer
that they needed to 'voluntarily' pump their wells into the river for
'tribal trust' or their water would be shut off. So they pumped.}
Sabo made it clear that the BOR wants to restore
certainty to farm irrigation but they are restricted by the current BO's.
The National Academy of Science (NAS) draft report supported flows like
the previous 10 years and not higher water flows, but the current BO's
demand high water levels to fix the river. According to Sabo, we
must wait for the NAS report to be finalized before a reconsultation on
the current BOs can take place.
Dave Cacka, KWUA water bank committee chairman and
Malin farmer, stated that last year John Keyes and Bennett Raley
asked KWUA to form a water bank to provide water for downstream
purposes. The water bank committee has met over 40 times to develop
a 65 page plan with principals. Of these, certainty was the key
principle, that the water users who do not relinquish their water rights
this year will be assured of irrigation water for the entire year.
The Department of the Interior will not provide that assurance. The
committee wanted a water bank plan for years that there are low river
flows. The BO wants 75,000AF next year, and 100,000AF thereafter, no
matter what the water levels are. So Cacka clarified that this water
bank is not the one that KWUA committee meticulously drafted, but rather
it is a BOR plan. "The 65 page document is still on the table, and didn't
see the light of day." This BOR plan will idle 12,000 acres of land
and 25,000AF additional water. It will not guarantee a water
supply . It is not our answer. It is not overseen by
districts. KWUA plans to stay engaged to try to eventually gain
certainty for the remainder of the project.
Kevin Conroy, from NRCS, said that there will be
programs available this year to help fund planting a cover crop for idled
land and waterfowl forage.
Dr Harry Carlson, California Extension Office,
explained the criteria for idling land, and how the figures for land types
were derived. Land idled will be ranked by crop and soil types which will
give maximum water savings, yet minimize 3rd party impacts. Applications
are due this Friday, March 7.
Barry Norris, ODWR (Oregon Dept of Water Resources),
said that Oregon well owners need to obtain drought permit if they plan to
pump. For more information call 883-4182.
There was a question and answer period. Ed
Bartell, from the Upper Klamath Basin, brought to the crowds attention
that the land being bought for inflated prices by Rangeland Trust for
wetlands was depleting our water supply. Since tens of thousands of
acres of farm and pasture land have been converted to wetlands, the water
going into Klamath River has severely been reduced. He showed a
chart of the water that has been depleted from the system, since wetlands
use much more water than farmland. Rangeland's plan is to take all
the farmland and pastures in Upper Basin out of production. His
concerns were met with applause. Bartell also was concerned
that his permanent water source may be in jeopardy if we must idle
farmland from our stored irrigation water supply. Others were
concerned also about future effects and future rights given up, but Sabo
said he thought there would be none.
Gary Orem, farmer, asked what if he is pumping his
Oregon well and the neighbor's well goes dry, will he be shut down.
The answer was, the neighbor must drill his well deeper.
One question asked was, "What are we doing about the
false science--it's costing us a livelihood?" Sabo replied, "There is no
money appropriated to get the species delisted.' It was followed by a
comment from the crowd, "Our only chance is to get out of the United
Nations--that's where the ESA is'.
The last speaker, Walt Moden, said that this is a
nightmare coming true. He had heard of the "World Bank Water Policy'
plan several years ago, and one of the goals to get land out of production
was to form 'water banks.' They focus on entire river basins,
claiming that there is mismanagement, environmental damage due to
distorted policies, they have 'demand management' which uses price-based
incentives to enforce low water usage, ration water, claim agriculture
uses too much water, and claims farmers and ranchers don't pay enough for
water. They press for national water agencies to run water policies.
"Agenda 21 from the 1992 United Nations Conference on Environment and
Development is using the guiding principle to demand management to control
the use and distribution of water by: the use of price, volume
restrictions, and invasive regulations.
As people were leaving and gathering in groups, the
discussions ranged dismay to disbelief at the United Nations agenda,
concern that we are being forced to downsize the project and fix all the
woes of the entire Klamath River watershed when the Project is only 2% of
the watershed, wonder why we must provide higher than historical
water flows to a river that had no fish kills on low water years and fish
kills on high water years. One group was discussing the 50 drug labs
poisoning the Klamath River. Some felt they are being forced
to 'downsize' farming in the basin, but are given no choices, even though
the science does not substantiate these drastic measures. These was
discontent that 'tribal trust' is not quantified yet the Klamath Basin has
to provide it from water they store, and discontent that the USFWS has no
water plan and used more water last year in a low water year than in the
past 50 years. Discussed were all the wells that have been going dry when
ag wells are pumped.
There were two hopes expressed during the meeting.
One was that the Bush administration would make good on their pledge to
help get resolve the water issue while sustaining agriculture in the
Klamath Basin if we do our best to conserve water and make a plan, which
we did.
The hope and advice Dave Sabo gave the Klamath Basin
farmers and ranchers was, "We need to pray together for water."
So, President Bush, and God, we're depending on you.