Our Klamath Basin Water Crisis
Upholding rural Americans' rights to grow food,
own property, and caretake our wildlife and natural resources.
FERC Agrees with LaMalfa: KRRC Can’t Handle Klamath Dams’ License
LaMalfa Suggests Relicensing Would Be Cost-effective and Provide Reliable Energy
Yreka News Facebook Page 7/17/2020
Rep. Doug LaMalfa issued the following statement after the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) announced that the Klamath River Renewal Corporation (KRRC) lacked the finances and experience to be the sole licensees of the four dams on the Klamath River. At PacifiCorp’s discretion KRRC may be a co-licensee, but PacificCorp would retain liability for the hydropower dams on the Klamath River. PacifiCorp previously announced they would seek to transfer the license to operate these dams to the Klamath River Renewal Corporation, who would assume all liability and then oversee their removal. FERC’s July 16th Order states KRRC is “not equipped to handle” this project, and “has limited finances and no experience with hydropower dam operation or dam removal.”
“The Commission’s Order today reinforces what I have been saying since KRRC’s inception: KRRC is incapable of handling any hydropower project. Rather, KRRC is nothing more than a shell corporation created for California, Oregon, and other supporters of dam removal to avoid liability and leave local communities to clean up the mess they would create. I am happy to see that FERC agreed with the many issues I, and other stakeholders, brought to their attention," stated LaMalfa. "It would have set a dangerous precedent to give a shell cooperation sole liability for the immense damage to the environment and local economy that this project would create. Smaller dam removal projects have faced significantly higher costs than originally estimated and this project has made the same failed assumptions. This Order clears the way to stop this terrible project without wasting more of California taxpayer funds or Oregon ratepayer dollars. PacifiCorp should instead pursue relicensing of all four Klamath dams, ensuring the Basin continues to receive ample carbon free, clean power for years to come.”
Dam removal would result in a muddy trickle of water by fall every year. The dams are controlling water release and preventing a major fish kill plus many other benefits for all of us. NO to dam removal!
Very happy with this decision. Even though they have been adding money our Power bill for years we are not happy with the proposal to pull the dams
After watching them pull water out to put on the Klamathon Fire...definitely NO!! removal!
I really don’t know much about this but I do know that one bubble sent up through a pipe at depth can move a lot of water that will turn a power turbine creating power. It’s called overunity.
LaMouthfull... has many words.
In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107, any copyrighted material herein is distributed without profit or payment to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving this information for non-profit research and educational purposes only. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml
Page Updated: Saturday July 18, 2020 08:05 PM Pacific
Copyright © klamathbasincrisis.org, 2001 - 2019, All Rights Reserved