Time to Take Action
Our Klamath Basin Water Crisis
Upholding rural Americans' rights to grow food,
own property, and caretake our wildlife and natural resources.

Preservation plan unveiled for sage grouse. Proposal could affect 10 states, oil and natural gas development

Herald and News 5/29/15

     CHEYENNE, Wyo.  — Interior Secretary Sally Jewell revealed plans Thursday to preserve habitat in 10 Western states for an imperiled ground-dwelling bird, the federal government’s biggest land-planning effort to date for conservation of a single species.

   The proposal would affect energy development. The regulations would require oil and gas wells to be clustered in groups of a half dozen or more to avoid scattering them across habitat of the greater sage grouse. Drilling near breeding areas would be prohibited during mating season, and power lines would be moved away from prime habitat to avoid serving as perches for raptors that eat sage grouse.

   Some will say the plans don’t go far enough to protect the bird, Jewell said.

   “But I would say these plans are grounded in sound science — the best available science,” she said at a news conference on a ranch near Cheyenne. Sage grouse are chicken-sized birds that inhabit grass and sagebrush ecosystems in 11 states from California to the Dakotas. The rules would not apply to a relatively small area of habitat in Washington state. The bird’s numbers have declined sharply in recent decades, and some environmentalists warn they are at risk of extinction.

   The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service faces a court-ordered deadline of Sept. 30 to decide whether the greater sage grouse needs protection as a threatened or endangered species. Many Western lawmakers and representatives of the oil-and-gas and agriculture industries say a threatened or endangered listing would devastate the region’s economy.

   Congress voted late last year to withhold funding to implement any listing until September 2016. Other measures pending before U.S. lawmakers aim to postpone any federal listing for five years or more as states develop their own plans for conserving habitat.  

   Republicans in Congress criticized the plans as federal overreach.

   “This is just flat out wrong,” said U.S. Rep. Rob Bishop of Utah, chairman of the House Natural Resources Committee. “The state plans work. This proposal is only about controlling land, not saving the bird.”

   But Wyoming shows that sage grouse and energy development can co-exist, Jewell said. It is a top oil, natural gas and coal producer with a sage grouse conservation strategy being copied by other states and the federal government.

   “There is no future for our economy if we don’t take care of the sage grouse,” said Wyoming Gov. Matt Mead, a Republican who took part in the announcement. “That’s a fact. Some like it, some don’t.”  

   Several environmental groups welcomed the plans.

   “The sage grouse’s listing under the Endangered Species Act is an outcome from which no one stands to gain, least of all public lands sportsmen,” said Land Tawney, executive director of Backcountry Hunters and Anglers.

   In what some environmentalists view as an accommodation to industry, the rules would not seek to block development across sage grouse habitat. The government still intends to honor valid and existing rights to develop resources on that land, the Interior Department said.

   Even so, the Western Energy Alliance, a Denver-based petroleum industry advocacy group, pledged to support the federal legislation to postpone any sage grouse listing.

   “The economic impact of sage-grouse restrictions on just the oil and natural gas industry will be between 9,170 and 18,250 jobs and $2.4 billion to $4.8 billion of annual economic impact across Colorado, Montana, Utah and Wyoming,” said Kathleen Sgamma, the alliance’s vice president of government and public affairs.  

   The U.S. Bureau of Land Management expects to adopt the new measures by late summer. They would apply to federal lands in California, Colorado, Idaho, Montana, Nevada, North Dakota, Oregon, South Dakota, Utah and Wyoming.

   Federally identified habitat for the greater sage grouse across the Western U.S. totals an area about the size of Colorado. The Interior Department has classified about two-thirds of that range as priority habitat, including areas that could have restrictions on development.

   Restrictions would vary between states. Wyoming, with as many as 500,000 greater sage grouse, is home to more of the birds than any other state by far.  

  Male sage grouses fight for the attention of female southwest of Rawlins, Wyo. On Thursday, U.S. Interior Secretary Sally Jewell announced new measures to help conserve habitat in 10 states for the imperiled ground-dwelling bird.




WASHINGTON — The Department of Interior on Thursday proposed added controls across 17 million acres in rural Nevada and northeastern California to preserve habitat and avoid an endangered species listing for the imperiled sage grouse.

Solar and wind energy development would be excluded or subject to added scrutiny across Northern Nevada, according to a new environmental impact report. Controls would be put in place for geothermal and oil and gas exploration over 15 million acres and restricted outright in 1.5 million acres of the most sensitive areas where the range birds flock.

There would be potential effects on mining and grazing in the best remaining areas for the grouse, whose population has dropped from the millions to about 200,000 to 500,000 across the West.

The effort was described by naturalists as the largest ever wildlife conservation project on public lands.

The proposed land plans for all or part of 16 counties in Nevada and parts of five counties in California was multiplied across eight other Western states where the Department of Interior is updating management plans covering 165 million acres — an area the size of Texas — in consideration of the sage grouse.

Clark County and the Nellis Test and Training Range are the only parts of Nevada not covered by the plan, according to the Bureau of Land Management.

The chicken-sized range bird with the puffed-out chest and feathered starburst tail is being considered for listing as an endangered or threatened species, a decision to be made by the U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service by September.

It remains to be seen whether the federal management plans, with initiatives being undertaken by private and state landholders, could be enough to avoid a listing that could bring with it deeper impacts on the region’s land-based economy.

“The West is rapidly changing — with increasingly intense wildfires, invasive species and development altering the sagebrush landscape and threatening wildlife, ranching and our outdoor heritage,” Interior Secretary Sally Jewell said in a statement from Wyoming, the state most covered by sage grouse habitat.

“As land managers of two-thirds of greater sage-grouse habitat, we have a responsibility to take action that ensures a bright future for wildlife and a thriving western economy,” she said. “We are laying important foundation to save the disappearing sagebrush landscape of the American West.”

In the courts and on Capitol Hill, energy companies and developers have clashed with conservationists over the sage grouse.

Republican Rep. Mark Amodei, whose Northern Nevada district is most affected by the sage grouse, inserted a provision in an appropriations bill last year denying the Interior Department funding to finalize an endangered species decision, but department attorneys found a way to work most of the way around it.

Sen. Harry Reid, D-Nev., on Thursday praised the Obama administration’s “unprecedented collaboration” with states, local governments and stakeholders to balance habitat protection with the needs of rural communities.

The land plans “are the best chance we have of keeping the bird off the endangered species list,” Reid said.

Not only sage grouse but 350 other species rely on healthy sagebrush habitat, including elk, mule deer and pronghorn antelope, Interior officials said.

“It has been impressive and downright inspiring to see the BLM engaging in true landscape level planning focused on the need for conservation as part of managing public lands,” said Nada Culver, senior director at The Wilderness Society. “We’ve seen the progress that can be made when you work with local communities, county and state leaders, alongside energy developers and the conservation community.”

But an unhappy Amodei said the department disregarded Nevada recommendations to focus less on land restrictions and more on reducing the threat of wildfires that wipe out grouse habitat.

“Collaboration, I guess, is in the eyes of the beholder,” he said. “Really? They listened to the people of Nevada? This is the height of federal administrative arrogance. This is a kick in the ass to the people of Nevada who have the greatest stake in preserving their resources and also being responsible with respect to what they do with their land.”

“These restrictive plans may be well-intended, but they are coming from the wrong direction,” added Rep. Cresent Hardy, R-Nev. “Leave conservation efforts to local people who know and use the land best, not Washington bureaucrats who have no idea what it’s like to live and work with our state’s natural resources below ground and the magnificent species above ground.”

Interior officials said the land use plans took a layered approach that offers the highest levels of protection to the most valuable habitat. They classify the strongholds important to the bird’s survival as “sagebrush focal areas.” About 3 million acres of such focal areas were identified in Nevada.

The plan also classified sage grouse “priority habitat” (9.9 million acres in Nevada) and “general habitat” (6.1 million acres in Nevada) subject to varying levels of special management.

Interior officials said the “vast majority” of land within priority habitat have “zero to low potential” for fossil energy, wind or solar development.

Another 6.5 million acres in Nevada was tagged as “other habitat” where sage grouse are found but which the BLM said is not being subjected to land controls other than encouraging users to follow best practices in their activities.

Interior officials said 55 million acres in Nevada controlled by the BLM and the Forest Service were studied before 17 million acres were set aside for up­dated management plans.

The plans released Thursday will be finalized after a 60-day review by governors and a concurrent 30-day protest period, according to the Interior Department.

Amodei predicted Republicans in Congress will mount a new effort to delay or kill the plans.

“We are going to see another ugly, counterproductive Congress-versus-the-executive-branch fight on this,” he said.

Contact Review-Journal Washington Bureau Chief Steve Tetreault at stetreault@reviewjournal.com or 202-783-1760. Find him on Twitter: @STetreaultDC.




In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107, any copyrighted material herein is distributed without profit or payment to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving this information for non-profit research and educational purposes only. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml

Home Contact


              Page Updated: Sunday May 31, 2015 07:19 PM  Pacific

             Copyright © klamathbasincrisis.org, 2001 - 2015, All Rights Reserved